Why Lando Norris thinks 2026 F1 cars are a step backward

Why Lando Norris thinks 2026 F1 cars are a step backward

Lando Norris isn't known for holding back, but his recent assessment of the 2026 Formula 1 regulations is particularly brutal. After qualifying sixth for the Australian Grand Prix, the McLaren driver and defending champion didn't just complain about a bad day at the office. He attacked the very soul of the new machinery, claiming the sport has moved from the "best cars ever" to "probably the worst."

It's a heavy statement. We're talking about an era where the cars were expected to be more nimble, lighter, and better for racing. Instead, Norris describes a driving experience that sounds more like an exercise in frustration than a flat-out sprint. If the fastest drivers on the planet are telling you the cars "suck," it's time to look past the PR spin.

The frustration of the 50-50 power split

The heart of the problem is the new power unit. F1 shifted to a nearly 50-50 split between internal combustion and electrical energy. While that sounds great for a sustainability brochure, it's a nightmare for a driver trying to find a rhythm.

In the previous era, which Norris calls the "best," you could focus on the limit of the chassis. Now, you're constantly managing a battery pack that dictates how you enter every corner. Norris pointed out that you have to lift off the throttle in places you’d normally be pinned just to make sure the "pack is at the top."

It’s counterintuitive. You’re decelerating massively before you even reach the braking zone. If you miss five laps in a practice session now, you're not just behind on setup—your engine hasn't "learned" how to deploy energy for that specific track. You’re fighting a computer as much as you’re fighting the track.

Why the ground effect era was the peak for drivers

When Norris talks about the "best cars ever," he’s referring to the 2022-2025 generation. Despite the early issues with porpoising and the physical toll on drivers' backs, those cars were monsters. They were heavy, sure, but the downforce generated by the underfloor tunnels made them incredibly rewarding to drive at the limit.

The 2026 regulations scrapped those venturi tunnels in favor of a flatter floor. The goal was to reduce weight and size, making the cars more "agile." But according to Norris, the trade-off hasn't been worth it. The loss of that planted, high-downforce feel has been replaced by a "scrappy" sensation.

  • The 2025 cars were about 3.5 seconds faster around Melbourne than the 2026 polesitter.
  • Drivers now have to use "gears you don't want to use" to manage engine braking and regen.
  • The reliance on active aerodynamics to compensate for drag makes the car's balance feel inconsistent.

George Russell might be smiling because he's on pole, but even in the Mercedes garage, there’s an acknowledgment that these cars are a different breed. They aren't as "nice" to drive. They’re finicky.

The value of a lap has skyrocketed

In the old days, a driver could miss a session and recover. The car was a known quantity. Now, the complexity of the energy harvesting means every second on track is a data-mining expedition for the engineers.

Norris mentioned that if the battery pack isn't managed perfectly, "you're screwed." It’s no longer just about who can brake the latest or carry the most speed through a corner. It’s about who can manage a complex harvest-and-deploy cycle without losing their mind.

The onboard footage tells the story. You see drivers "clipping"—running out of electrical boost—halfway down the straights. It looks like the car is hitting a wall. For a sport that brands itself as the pinnacle of technology, watching a car struggle to stay at top speed because the battery is empty is a tough sell.

Is there a fix or are we stuck

The FIA isn't going to scrap the rules after one race. They’re committed to this path because it’s what the manufacturers wanted. Mercedes seems to have found a sweet spot early on, but for teams like McLaren, the struggle is real. Andrea Stella has already hinted that they need to work closer with Mercedes HPP to figure out the power delivery.

The reality is that F1 has prioritized "road relevance" and "sustainability" over the pure driving experience. While the cars are smaller and technically more "efficient," they've lost the raw, aggressive edge that made the previous generation so special to the people sitting in the cockpit.

Don't expect the complaining to stop. Until the teams find a way to make the energy deployment feel natural, drivers like Norris will continue to pine for the days of the "best cars ever."

If you're watching the races this year, pay attention to the exit of the corners. You'll see the drivers fighting the car's electronics as much as the steering wheel. It's a new era, but as Lando says, it might just be the worst one yet. Keep an eye on the development updates from Woking; if McLaren can't bridge the gap to Mercedes in energy management, this is going to be a very long season for the defending champ.

AK

Alexander Kim

Alexander combines academic expertise with journalistic flair, crafting stories that resonate with both experts and general readers alike.